Deep dry needling (DN) and manual therapy (MT) are two widely used treatments for myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD), a condition that causes orofacial pain, limited jaw movement, and muscle tenderness. Both approaches offer pain relief and improvements in jaw mobility, but each has unique features and limitations.
Key Findings:
- Pain Reduction: Both DN and MT effectively reduce pain. Manual therapy slightly outperforms dry needling in average pain reduction scores (2.92 vs. 2.52 points on a 10-point scale).
- Jaw Mobility: Both methods improve active mouth opening, though neither consistently achieves clinically significant differences.
- Treatment Speed: DN provides faster initial relief, while MT offers gradual, sustained improvements.
- Side Effects: DN has a higher rate of minor side effects (36.7%), such as bruising and soreness, compared to MT.
- Accessibility: MT requires multiple sessions and relies on practitioner skill, while DN may require frequent follow-ups to maintain relief.
Quick Comparison:
| Aspect | Deep Dry Needling (DN) | Manual Therapy (MT) |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Reduction | 2.52 points average decrease | 2.92 points average decrease |
| Relief Speed | Faster initial relief | Gradual, sustained improvement |
| Side Effects | 36.7% minor adverse events | Fewer adverse events |
| Session Frequency | May require regular follow-ups | Requires multiple sessions |
| Suitability | Limited by contraindications | Broadly applicable |
Both treatments are effective options for managing TMD symptoms. The choice largely depends on patient preferences, medical history, and access to skilled practitioners. Combining these therapies with education or other treatments can further improve outcomes.
Manual Therapy and Dry Needling for TMJ and Jaw Pain
1. Deep Dry Needling Results
Deep dry needling is a minimally invasive treatment aimed at addressing myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD). This technique specifically targets active trigger points to alleviate pain and improve function, offering an alternative to manual therapy.
Pain Relief
Studies show that deep dry needling can provide immediate pain relief. For instance, research by Macedo de Sousa et al. reported a significant reduction in pain intensity right after treatment (p < 0.0001) [2]. While some pain may return within 1–2 weeks, levels remain noticeably lower than before treatment even a month later (p = 0.0005) [2].
"Dry needling of active MTrPs in the masseter and temporalis muscles in patients with myofascial TMD has been found to produce immediate improvements in and relief of pain, tenderness and function." – Menéndez‑Torre et al. [7]
One reason for its effectiveness is its ability to reach deeper myofascial structures that manual therapy often cannot access. By targeting these deep-seated trigger points, dry needling not only reduces pain but also enhances jaw functionality.
Jaw Mobility
Beyond pain relief, deep dry needling has been shown to improve jaw mobility significantly. A randomized controlled trial by García‐de‐la‐Banda‐García et al. observed that patients’ active maximal mouth opening (AMMO) increased by 0.06 inches after the first session and by 0.11 inches after completing treatment [3]. Similarly, Blasco‐Bonora et al. found substantial improvements in jaw opening (p < 0.001), with effect sizes of Cohen’s d = 0.77 immediately after treatment and d = 1.02 at the 1-week follow-up [5]. These enhancements in mobility are essential for individuals whose TMD symptoms disrupt daily activities like eating, speaking, and maintaining oral hygiene.
Treatment Accessibility
Deep dry needling stands out for its minimal invasiveness and quick recovery time, allowing patients to resume normal activities immediately. Its effectiveness depends on factors like needle depth and session duration [4], giving healthcare providers the flexibility to tailor treatments to individual needs. The rapid pain relief also enables patients to quickly gauge whether the therapy is working for them. For those who haven’t found relief through other conservative treatments, deep dry needling offers a targeted approach to address muscle tension and pain. This adaptability makes it a valuable addition to comprehensive TMD treatment plans and sets the stage for comparing its outcomes to manual therapy.
2. Manual Therapy Results
Manual therapy takes a hands-on approach to treating myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD), aiming to relieve muscle tension, improve joint function, and reduce pain. Unlike deep dry needling, which targets trigger points, manual therapy uses physical manipulation to address symptoms through non-invasive techniques.
Pain Relief
Manual therapy has proven effective in reducing pain for individuals with myofascial TMD. Research, including systematic reviews and clinical trials, shows that it can lead to an immediate drop in pain levels – up to 2.1 points on a 0–10 pain scale – with benefits lasting both in the short and long term [9].
One systematic review involving 279 patients found that manual therapy, either on its own or combined with counseling, consistently delivered pain relief across all studies analyzed [8]. For example, a 2018 study by Brochado et al. in Brazil involved 51 participants with myogenic and arthrogenic TMD. Over four weeks, patients received three weekly 21-minute sessions targeting the masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joint (TMJ). By day 14, pain levels had significantly decreased (p < .05) [9].
This pain reduction may stem from the activation of nerve pathways that naturally dampen pain signals. Additionally, manual therapy can stimulate opioid, oxytocin, and dopamine systems, contributing to both physical and emotional relief [10]. Beyond just easing pain, it also enhances jaw mobility, addressing another critical aspect of TMD management.
Jaw Mobility
Improving jaw function and flexibility is another focus of manual therapy. Techniques like jaw mobilization, craniosacral therapy, myofascial release, and targeted massage are often paired with exercises and stretches to restore range of motion [12]. These methods work together to improve joint movement and muscle flexibility.
Clinical evidence supports structured manual therapy programs. For example, a regimen of at least five 30-minute sessions – including mobilization, stretching, isometric exercises, guided jaw movements, joint distraction, disc/condyle adjustments, postural corrections, and relaxation techniques – has been shown to mitigate TMJ-related symptoms effectively [13].
For patients experiencing "locked" jaws, therapists often address disc displacement with tailored exercises to restore motion. Soft tissue mobilization can also reduce muscle tenderness and trigger points, while improved alignment through manual therapy may decrease the likelihood of teeth grinding [14].
Patient Satisfaction
Patients undergoing manual therapy frequently report high levels of satisfaction, praising its effectiveness in pain management and the collaborative approach to treatment. Surveys indicate that about 66.6% of patients would recommend manual therapy to others facing similar oral health challenges [15].
"Subjective pain relief, since the initial evaluation and current pain emerged as significant predictors of patients’ satisfaction in general." – Riley et al. [15]
Interestingly, factors like depressive symptoms can negatively impact satisfaction, while clear communication, active involvement in treatment decisions, and understanding the diagnosis positively influence patient experiences [15].
Treatment Accessibility
Manual therapy stands out for its personalized and accessible nature. Its hands-on approach allows for gradual, tailored improvements over multiple sessions. Studies show that combining manual therapy with home exercises leads to significantly lower pain levels over time, with benefits observed across six weeks to a year [8][9][11].
In fact, combining manual therapy with other treatments enhances its effectiveness. One study found a 3.5-point greater reduction in pain scores when manual therapy was paired with therapeutic exercises compared to exercises alone [11]. This versatility makes manual therapy a valuable option for managing TMD symptoms effectively.
sbb-itb-ed556b0
Benefits and Drawbacks
When it comes to treating myofascial temporomandibular disorders, deep dry needling (DN) and manual therapy (MT) each bring their own strengths and challenges. Understanding these can help patients make informed decisions about which approach might suit them best.
Deep Dry Needling Benefits
Deep dry needling works by targeting trigger points with needles to release tension and encourage healing [17]. According to the Cleveland Clinic, this technique can "decrease tightness, increase blood flow, and reduce local and referred pain" when applied to muscles and tissues [1]. Research has shown that needling active trigger points in muscles like the masseter and temporalis can significantly reduce pain and improve the pressure-pain threshold [16].
Deep Dry Needling Drawbacks
While effective, dry needling isn’t without its downsides. Studies show that 36.7% of treatments result in minor side effects, such as bleeding (16%), bruising (7.7%), and pain during the procedure (5.9%) [18]. Patients may also experience soreness and fatigue after treatment [19].
More serious complications, though rare (less than 0.1% of cases), include risks like organ damage (e.g., pneumothorax), nerve injury, or infection [18]. Because of these risks, certain individuals – such as pregnant women, those with active infections, or individuals with severe needle phobia – should avoid this therapy [1][19].
Another consideration is that the effects of dry needling may fade over time, often requiring frequent follow-up sessions to maintain relief [20].
Manual Therapy Benefits
Manual therapy offers a hands-on approach that can improve range of motion, reduce ischemia, break down adhesions, stimulate proprioception, and increase synovial fluid production – all while alleviating pain [11]. Research ranks manual therapy as highly effective for pain reduction, with a SUCRA score of 0.902, slightly outperforming deep dry needling’s score of 0.807 [6].
Its non-invasive nature and gradual progression make it a popular choice among patients, especially for those who prefer a more traditional, touch-based method.
Manual Therapy Drawbacks
For all its benefits, manual therapy typically requires multiple sessions over weeks or months, which may not appeal to those looking for quicker relief. Additionally, its effectiveness can diminish over time, potentially requiring ongoing maintenance treatments [6].
Another factor to consider is practitioner dependency. The success of manual therapy heavily relies on the therapist’s skill and experience, which can vary significantly [21].
Comparative Treatment Outcomes
| Aspect | Deep Dry Needling | Manual Therapy |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Reduction | 2.52 points average decrease [16] | 2.92 points average decrease [16] |
| Treatment Speed | Faster initial relief | Gradual relief |
| Side Effects | 36.7% minor adverse events [18] | Few adverse events |
| Patient Suitability | Limited by contraindications | Broadly applicable |
| Maintenance | Often requires regular follow-ups [20] | May require periodic maintenance [6] |
Both therapies have been shown to improve pain, mouth opening, cervical function, and pressure-pain thresholds in muscles related to temporomandibular joint function [16]. As Rocío García-de la-Banda-García et al. [16] summarized:
"The assessed therapies, DN and MT, are equally effective in improving pain, AMMO, cervical disability, and PPT in the muscles directly involved in the temporomandibular joint biomechanics of patients with myofascial TMDs."
Ultimately, the choice between deep dry needling and manual therapy should align with the patient’s unique needs, pain tolerance, medical history, and treatment preferences. By weighing these benefits and drawbacks, patients can take an active role in selecting the approach that best fits their situation.
Treatment Recommendations
Both deep dry needling and manual therapy have been shown to effectively address myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Choosing between these treatments depends largely on the specific needs and circumstances of each patient, paving the way for a more tailored approach to care.
Evidence-Based Treatment Selection
Research highlights that deep dry needling and manual therapy are equally effective in reducing pain, as confirmed by network meta-analysis findings [7]. Indirect comparisons showed no meaningful statistical difference between the two methods, suggesting that either can be confidently recommended. Studies consistently report similar outcomes for pain relief, active mouth opening, cervical disability, and pressure–pain threshold across both treatments [22].
Treatment Selection Criteria
Since both approaches offer comparable results, other factors like patient preferences, medical history, and treatment availability play a key role in decision-making. For instance, some individuals may prefer manual therapy due to its noninvasive nature, while others might opt for deep dry needling. Clinicians should carefully evaluate each patient’s medical background to determine the most appropriate treatment [3].
Functional Outcome Expectations
Both therapies improve critical functional areas, though their impact on specific outcomes varies slightly. Pain reductions averaged 2.52 points for deep dry needling and 2.92 points for manual therapy [22]. However, neither consistently achieved the minimal clinically important difference for active mouth opening, indicating that expectations for significant jaw mobility improvements should remain realistic [3]. Achieving functional gains in jaw mobility or reducing cervical disability may require extended or combined treatment strategies [3].
Integrated Treatment Approach
To maximize outcomes, a more comprehensive treatment plan is often beneficial. Evidence shows that combining manual therapy or physical therapy with patient education yields better short-term results compared to home exercises or education alone [23]. Additionally, an integrated care model involving collaboration between dentists, physiotherapists, and mental health professionals can address both the physical and psychological aspects of TMD [23]. This holistic approach not only targets symptom relief but also addresses underlying dysfunctions, complementing the specific therapies outlined above.
Given that TMD affects an estimated 5% to 12% of the population [6], healthcare providers must prioritize individualized treatment plans. By considering each patient’s unique needs, preferences, and clinical presentation, practitioners can deliver more effective and patient-centered care.
FAQs
What should I consider when deciding between deep dry needling and manual therapy for myofascial temporomandibular disorders?
When it comes to treating myofascial temporomandibular disorders, the choice between deep dry needling and manual therapy often boils down to how well they ease pain. Studies indicate that both methods can be effective, though manual therapy generally edges out slightly in terms of pain relief and overall improvement.
If you’re exploring treatment options, it’s a good idea to talk with your healthcare provider. They can help you decide which approach suits your specific symptoms, needs, and goals. Each method has its own advantages, and a tailored plan can make all the difference in achieving the best results.
What are the differences in side effects and recovery times between deep dry needling and manual therapy for jaw-related muscle pain?
Both deep dry needling and manual therapy are proven methods for easing jaw-related muscle pain and improving mobility. While both treatments are effective, they come with slight differences in side effects and recovery experiences.
With dry needling, you might experience mild and short-lived soreness in the treated area. On the other hand, manual therapy can sometimes lead to brief discomfort during or shortly after the session. Recovery for both tends to be quick, usually lasting just a few days to a week, depending on the individual.
Both treatments are considered safe and well-tolerated. Dry needling might provide quicker relief for some, but the best choice depends on your specific situation. Be sure to consult your healthcare provider to determine the most suitable option for your needs.
Can using deep dry needling and manual therapy together improve treatment for myofascial temporomandibular disorders?
Combining deep dry needling with manual therapy could offer improved results for managing myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Both methods are known to help alleviate pain, enhance jaw movement, and restore muscle function. Research indicates that using these two therapies together might yield better results than relying on just one.
If you’re considering treatment options for TMD, consult your healthcare provider to find the approach that best suits your symptoms and needs.
Comments are closed